Search Results for: "LaBOUR EXPENSES" ...

So who is pulling the Councils strings in York?

The national media has revealed that half the candidates fighting winnable parliamentary seats for Labour are UNITE sponsored militants.

PuppetMaster

They include the York Central candidate Rachel Maskell.

However the level of manipulation and control at Council election level is much less clear. The Electoral Commission statistics are currently only quoting quarter 4 donations (£800 from the GMB to York Labour Party)

Trades Unions don’t sponsor candidates without expecting something in return.

 In 2011, UNISON’s £5000 gift to the York Labour party bought them job security for their members – or so they thought. In the end, the new Labour administration cut deeper and privatised more jobs than had its LibDem led predecessor.

Relationships between a bullish and inexperienced Labour Council leadership and many employees were strained to say the least.

Electors though can get only a glimpse of who the puppet-masters are at this stage.

The sponsorship of existing Councillors is declared on the register of interests. Over 50% of Labour Councillors admit Trades Union links.

The amount of financial sponsorship has to be declared on election expenses returns. But these will only be published later in the summer – long after votes have been cast.

A more sinister development is that some candidates have removed any mention of trades union affiliations from their biographies and twitter accounts.

All parties should publish a list of their major local sponsors before the elections take place.  Voters will have to draw their own conclusions about what any sponsorship is intended to buy.

The drift into “behind closed doors” decision making may be one consequence of the influence that sectional interest groups now have on Labour in York

NB. The Council’s interests register entries should be treated with some caution. Cllr Helen Douglas who is standing for election as a Conservative candidate in Strensall declares her membership of “The Labour Party” in her entry in the register!!

The way we were in 2013

The way we were 2013

Jan 2013— There were major delays in post Christmas refuse collections. It was revealed that York taxpayers were paying interest charges of £651,000 a month on accumulated Council debts. Councillors travel expenses were under the microscope. The Tour de France route was revealed.

Feb 2013—Proposed changes to ward boundaries were published. Councillors were accused of bullying officials in York. Charging for green bin emptying was proposed. Later the Council would charge for second bin emptying and, more recently, propose to extend the charge to cover all green bins.  The Chain gang principle was extended to public space maintenance. 50% increase in car parking charges was announced.

March 2013Acomb Alive announced an events programme. Police enforcement policy on 20 mph limits was confused.  The York Council announced major public service cuts. Only 17% of goods and services bought by the Council were “locally sourcedKings Square was to get £490,000 facelift.

April 2013— The York Council announced that it will no longer “scout” for faulty streetlights. The decision is to result in a big increase in faulty lights. Gale Farm Court management arrangements were under the spotlight. Plans to build on York’s Green Belt are announced by Labour while traveller site locations also slip out. The city centre swimming pool project is ditched by Labour

May 2013—Petition launched opposing “Showman’s Yard” plan for Wetherby Road. First signs that support for Labour party in York was plummeting. Former Labour Councillor Lynn Jeffries joins LibDems. Lowfields care village opening date slips to 2016. The project was later to be abandoned altogether.

June 2013— Labour started “webcasting” its Cabinet meetings. Taxpayers fund a £180 pedicure. A large number of speeders are caught by mobile cameras.

July 2013— The Toy bus is scrapped. Labour plan to close Lendal Bridge despite a big opposition petition. It was to be the defining moment for the present administration. The Council was urged to “pull back from the brink” as it introduced a wide area 20 mph speed limit.

August 2013— A big increase in warden call charges hits the elderly and disabled. A consultation hologram is suggested. LibDems publish an alternative to the Labour Local Plan . Council withdraws from the annual “Britain in Bloom” contest.  Lendal Bridge is closed. The “trial” is a shambles from day one.

September 2013— There is a call for the Lendal Bridge trial to be suspended as  fines totalling £500,000 are issued. Council is spending £1/4 million a year clearing fly tipping. New bin emptying schedules produce problems. The Council is to spend £1.4 million on the Tour de France. This will later increase to over £1.6 million.  Revised bus timetables introduced but the Council continues to refuse to publish reliability stats.

October 2013—York is to get more electric buses. In York, a number of  affordable homes projects falter. “Left luggage” arrangements at York station are criticised. Shopper numbers fall by 12%

November 2013Council debts are set to rise to £300 million.Council grants to Community centres are to be scrapped from April. The numbers fined on Lendal Bridge and Coppergate tops 35,000. The Council publishes a list of foreign trips made by Councillors and officials. A new TV station for York is announced. More than two years later, it has still to broadcast.

December 2013— It will cost 40p to spend a penny.  “Bed blocking “ at York hospital is on the increase.  Labour continued to evade answering questions about Lendal Bridge

How the Westfield Focus reported events in 2013

713  colour Lowfields page 1 Focus July 13 A3 713 Page 1 colour Chapelfields Focus July 13 A3 813  colour Page  1 Cornlands Focus Aug 13 A3 813  pages 1 colour Hob Moor Focus Aug 13 A3 1013  page 1 Front Street Focus Oct 13 A3 1013  pages 1  Chapelfields  Focus Oct 13 A3 1213  colour page 1 Foxwood Focus Dec 13 A3 Cornlands page 1 Focus Nov 13 A3 Hob Moor Cornlands Focus page 1 Nov 13 A3 d2 Hob Moor Focus Mar 13 A3 page 1 Westfield askham cornlands Focus June 13 A3 page 1 Westfield Foxwood Focus June 13 A3 page 1 Westfield Hob Moor Focus May 13 A3 Page 1 only Westfield St Stephens Focus May 13 A3 page 1

 

Foreign trip curbs to be introduced by York Council

Opposition Councillors move to reduce travel costs as taxpayers complain

The concerns expressed by many York residents, about the amount being spent on foreign visits and travel by both Councillors and officials, are to come under the microscope.

Cannes Nov 2012

The move comes after Labour lost overall control of the Council.

In the main the initiative is aimed at the payment of travel expenses incurred directly by the York Council but it has been suggested that this will be extended to cover other organisations that the Council has representation on and, in particular, those that receive significant Council grant funding.

Any new process will not put an outright ban on travel.

Rather a case for foreign travel will have to be considered by a public session of the all party Urgency committee (which meets each week). The expectation is that the aims of any travel will have to be identified and, later, that a note will be published indicating what was achieved by the trip.

The move is part of a raft of changes being proposed by opposition Councillors which could transform the way that the York Council does its business.

They aim is to make the Council more open and more sensitive to local residents views.

A key feature would be an end to “behind closed doors” decision making meetings.

The costs of foreign – and indeed UK – travel, have been a cause of criticism ever since Labour took control of the Council in 2011.

Previous stories – Click link to access

Cabinet approves £25,000 jaunt to Cannes

Labour Councillor’s Strasbourg trips

Shamed Labour Councillors publish expenses claims

York MPs travel expenses

York Councillors travel expenses exposeds

Foreign travel fails to broaden Social Services report

Labour Cabinet runs up £4000 travel bill.

More about foreign trips

York Council spent £5747 on trip to Cannes

Day out in Scotland

Day out in London

Scott resignation statement published – Ouch!

“It’s as bad in the York Labour Group as we all suspected

Broken roseThe second is an email to the Chief Executive of this council confirming that I have resigned the Labour Party Whip, I am no longer part of the Labour Group and will now be a Labour Independent Councillor.

“It has been a difficult decision for me to take.  I have been a member of the Labour Party for over 20 years.  I come from a long line of active trade unionists.  I didn’t just choose the party I was born into it.

“But the York Labour Party is not the Labour Party I joined.

We now have a Labour Group that is corrupt.

Corrupt intellectually and probably corrupt in other ways too.

There is not one member of this Cabinet I would offer a proper job to, not that many of them know what a proper job is.

“Its leadership team don’t lead  – they bully, scheme and connive.

The Leader behaves like a spoilt child almost stamping his feet if he doesn’t get his own way.

“Some will be aware that the Labour Whip was removed from me last year.  What you will not know is why.  I am now freed from the shackles of the secrecy of the Group and can say that there were two attempts to withdraw the Whip from me.  The first attempt had to be abandoned after it was found that the Chief Whip had broken a number of Party Rules in his haste to withdraw the whip from me.  The second attempt was quashed by a regional appeal panel.

“And what was my alleged crime?  I voted in favour of the removal of a number of expenses from members of this council in line with the recommendations of the Independent Remuneration Panel and an earlier decision of the Labour Group.

The Labour Group then broke its own rules to change its earlier decision after its Leader threatened to attend less meetings if his expenses weren’t going to be met.

“I have thought about whether I should resign my council seat.  I won’t for two reasons.

The First is all that would happen is that a York Labour clone will be put in place at the expense of the residents of the city.

Secondly remaining a councillor will allow me to represent the residents of clifton and the city in the proper Labour Way. The way that they thought they were voting for in the first place.

“My first speech in the Council ended with the verse by Pastor Martin Neilmoller.  I will remind you

“First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

“Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

“Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

“Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

“Recent events with me have shown that I can no longer hide my principles and socialists beliefs.  I have to speak out.  I have to make a stand.  We no longer follow Labour Principles.  We no longer show the Labour difference.

“We are no longer true Labour.

“I do this for the good of the Labour Party in York.  I make a plea to the members of the Party to reclaim their party from those that control it and are destroying it

“For my sins I came up with the phrase that York Deserves Better.

Sadly that still remains the case.

York not only deserves better, it deserves the best.

For the remaining months of this council I will do my best to achieve that with any group or grouping of councillors that demonstrates that they have ideas, drive and commitment to achieve the best for York.

 

“Fairness” conference cost over £18,000

York taxpayers to cough up £8235

york-fairness-conference-logo

A Freedom of Information request has revealed that the “Fairness Conference”, held earlier in the summer, cost £18,235 of which £10,000 was paid by Joseph Rowntrees Foundation.

The figures do not include “help in kind” contributions with the University providing free accommodation and an evening “reception”.

Speakers were not paid a fee but claimed £820 for air tickets, £303 for taxis, £361 for train tickets and £736 for accommodation.

The conference was criticised for unnecessary costs and lack of political balance in the line up of speakers (who were overwhelmingly Labour spokespeople).

Some suggested that the cost of the event might more usefully have been spent on the direct relief of poverty.

Full details of the expenses incurred can be found by clicking here

Cronyism alive and well at York Council?

The appointment of the Chair of the York Labour party, to the same role on the York@Large Board, led to a Freedom of Information request last month.

There have been increased concerns raised nationally about party nominees being appointed to run organisations and companies about which they have little knowledge and no personal democratic mandate.

This culminated in the Paul Flowers case which saw a man, with limited abilities and a dubious personal lifestyle, rise to the top of the Co Op Bank simply because he toed the Labour Party line.

In the 90’s, the Nolan Report aimed to bring transparency to the appointment of representatives on QUANGOS. The principles of openness were accepted by all political parties in York.

Those principles included the need to advertise vacancies on Boards. This included the appointment of “independent” Chairs.

York@Large (Y@L) is a Quango which in turn is a subsidiary of the larger Quango known as “York without Walls” (WOW).

The Board of WOW is also now dominated by Labour supporters and is chaired by James Alexander (the Council Leader)

democracy_-cartoon2

Y@L essentially seeks to manage the City’s cultural and leisure programmes. It has an interest in tourism although the interface with “Visit York” is hazy to say the least.

Its meeting minutes can be found on the WOW web site  A note on the web site currently says that the next meeting will be “held on 11th December 2013”! The meeting agendas do not encourage the public to attend.

There is no public record of the costs that Y@L incurs for Council Taxpayers

In the spring of 2013 the last Chair of Y@L came to the end of her maximum 3 year term of office.

A new Chair (Labour Party activist Patrick Kelly) was appointed at its annual meeting. Strangely no copies of the minutes of that meeting can be found on either the WOW web site nor in the Councils electronic library

So how come the Chair of the local Labour party came to be appointed to this prestigious position?

The Freedom of Information response is evasive, but acknowledges the possible conflicts with the Nolan principles.
————

Another little known “Board”, which exercises influencing over York’s schools system, is known as the “York Education Partnership”. It is a more open organisation and does publish the minutes of its meetings on the Councils web site.

It also undertakes a statutory role as the official “schools forum

It has an “independent” chair; the confusingly named David Cameron who hails from Fife in Scotland and who runs his own education consultancy company. He has a background as an Education Director in Sterling.

The appointment was a matter of interest for taxpayers not least because it attracts a fee of £500 a day – capped at £7500 annually – plus expenses.

If these Boards are really necessary, then the Council should make greater attempts to publicise any vacancies that arise.

Any costs incurred should be reported publicly in the same way as payments to Councillors are now reported routinely on the Councils web site.

—————–

Perhaps the penny has dropped as the Council has today made the following announcement. Whether launching a recruitment process over the festive period is wise is another matter.

Council’s social enterprise seeks Non-Exec Directors

One of City of York Council’s first social enterprise ‘spin-offs’ is looking to recruit two Non-Exec Directors to join its ranks when it is officially formed in the New Year.

The council has given the go-ahead for its Community Equipment Loan Store and Telecare Service to create a mutual from April 2014 that is majority staff-owned, with the authority continuing to have part ownership.

The team already supports over 3000 vulnerable people and is keen to grow and support many more vulnerable people across the city – helping to make York a great place to grow old.

The company will have a Board of Directors comprising of three staff, and three Non-Exec Directors – one of whom will be from the council. The team is looking to fill the two other Non-Exec Director posts.

The Board will meet 12 times a year for a minimum of two hours a session on a voluntary basis, with the first meeting in February.

The organisation is particularly seeking Non-Exec Directors with expertise in:

  • · Commercial Financial expertise and experience
  • · Commercial Business/Entrepreneurial knowledge and experience

· Marketing and Communications experience

· Current  knowledge of health, social care or community needs

To apply email heather.barden@york.gov.uk with a copy of your CV, or ring 07824 475368 for further information.

The closing date for applicants is Friday 3 January.

 

 

Day out in London

The Press have taken up the case of local Councillor Sonja Crisp who – as was reported on this web site last month – is prone to making trips to London at taxpayer’s expense.

The trips were not in themselves particularly expensive or exceptional, but her attempts to justify the £800 plus bill lacked conviction.

Portraying York on the national stage could mean anything.

Trip Advisor launches new guide

Trip Advisor launches new guide

At a time when the Council says that it can’t afford to spend £50 topping up salt bins, every expense should be challenged.

The Local Government Association (LGA) is little more than a talking shop and such business as it transacts (basically lobbying central government) is in the hands of a few leading councillors (none of whom are from York).

The minutes of the “Culture, Leisure and sports Board” meetings are publicly available and can be found here.

Neither suggests that the Council’s representative even uttered a word.

It would probably have gone unnoticed if the Councillor had not got “form”

Click

She also has the most fluid Register of Interests ever seen on the York Council web site. It includes a visit to Blackpool in August to participate in the “Baltic States Knowledge Exchange Visit 2013” (!!!)

Still it’s not as bad as the Labour MP, who claimed back – from taxpayers – 40p for the cost of buying a bottle of milk!

Cllr Crisp has to justify her activities to the next York Council meeting which takes place on 12th December.

She might anticipate some probing questions on her well travelled approach to Council work.

More on taxpayers subsidising political parties – MP claims back 40p for bottle of milk

A full list of the properties that MPs rent for their local offices has been published

expenses_460_1488724c

It reveals that the other local MP (Julian Sturdy, Conservative) also rents his office from his local political party

Taxpayers should be told how much rent is paid by MPs to rent offices (its around £10 million nationally). A report on the issue is expected in the spring.

There should be an independent audit to check that the amount being paid reflects a fair commercial rent for the space used and that there is no cross subsidy of political activities.

Meanwhile the latest expenses claims by local MPs have been published click here to download.

They reveal that during June and July this year High Bayley claimed £6,286 including 40p for a bottle of milk and £20 on Yorkshire Teabags.

Julian Sturdy claimed £7956 with £60 spent on London’s congestion charge.

During 2012/13 Hugh Bayley spent £21,153 on office costs. In total he claimed £163,529 in expenses

 

In the same period Julian Sturdy spent £11,374 on office costs and claimed a total of £131,321 in expenses

Click here for all details

Breaking through the secrecy?

Conservative Councillors are proposing a motion at Thursdays Council meeting which could help to raise the curtain of secrecy which descended when Labour took control 18 months ago. (http://tinyurl.com/York-Council-motions-13th-Dec) They are right to do so. Important decisions are being taken behind closed doors. Agendas are not published and officer reports remain confidential until decisions have been taken.

We doubt, however, if the paranoid Leadership of the Council will support the move.

In the meantime, the Council has to respect the legislation passed by the last government. One of the rights it gives is for Councillors to ask questions of those holding Cabinet/Executive responsibilities.

So on Thursday around 50 questions have been tabled. Although some are mundane in the extreme, others could provide information which could be of interest to residents. Some examples:

EMPTY SHOPS “What proportion of retail and office space is currently empty in each of the City’s sub-urban wards and how does this compare to the City Centre? How much of the “Innovation & Delivery Fund” and the “Economic Infrastructure Fund” does the Cabinet Leader intend to allocate to regeneration initiatives in sub-urban employment centres such as Acomb Front Street?”

COUNCIL HQ COSTS “Why is the Council purchasing 2405 new seats for the new Council offices when fewer than 1000 staff and visitors are likely to be in the building at any one time?” “What proportion of the furniture at the new HQ will be reused units from the existing offices?”

CHARGES FOR SPORTS “Following the latest Cabinet decisions, the level of concessionary charges for pensioners playing bowls on public greens will have doubled since Labour took over the leadership of the Council 18 months ago. How many concessionary tickets for this activity have been sold in each of the last 2 years, how much income has this produced for the Council and what are the forecast sales for 2013?”

CHARGES FOR SPORTS “In September the Cabinet promised to build on the legacy of the Olympics and improve sports participation in York. How does this fit with the plans to increase tennis court charges by 16.7% and 33% for concessions?”

CARE VILLAGE DELAYS “The Cabinet agreed an April 2014 completion date for the new ‘Care Village’ which is to be built on the former Lowfields School site. When does the Cabinet Member now expect the new Lowfields Care Village will be completed and available for occupation? What are the reasons for any delay?”

HOUSING WAITING LIST “How many people were registered on the housing waiting list in York when:
– The Cabinet Member took up post
– At the end of November 2012
How many additional social housing units have been occupied, and how many “new starts” on affordable housing units have been made, over the same period of time?”

WONDERLAND “Following 2012’s ‘Illuminating York’ debacle, will the Cabinet Member assure the council that the 2013 event will revert to its previous successful format?”

(more…)

York MPs First class travel preference

With the Chancellor of the Exchequer having to pay to upgrade his ticket to first class on a crowded train – much to the amusement of the media and Labour opposition MPs – we thought that we’d check on the travel preferences of York’s two local MPs.

As we’ve said before, Parliamentary expenses are now much more transparent and can be accessed by anyone by clicking here: http://www.parliamentary-standards.org.uk/

We can only hope that the shambolic register of interests published by the City of York Council can soon achieve the same standards of accuracy.

The latest figures available for MPs travel claims cover the 2011/12 financial year.

They reveal that Hugh Bayley (Labour York Central) claimed for First class rail travel on 23 of the 34 journeys undertook. In total his rail travel claims came to £4439

By contrast Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) submitted 22 rail claims none of which were for First class travel. In total taxpayers were asked to refund £2276 for Mr Sturdy’s rail travel.

We don’t think that using First class travel is a capital offence but, at times of austerity, taxpayers will expect all public servants to exercise prudence. The refunds claimed – for the same York to London return journey – varied from £89 to £234

Other types of expense claims revealed on the returns include:

Petrol: Bayley £ 4029 Sturdy £1059

Car parking: Bayley £864 Sturdy £880

Congestion charge: Bayley £113 Sturdy 0

Bus fares: Bayley £2.40 Sturdy: 0

Taxi: Bayley £76 Sturdy: £58

Bicycle: £70 Sturdy: 0

Total Travel: Bayley £11,216* Sturdy £4862

(*includes £513 for “food and drink”)