York Council in circles over roundabout advertising?

The York Council has applied to itself for permission to install small sponsorship adverts on local roundabouts.

The sponsorship scheme was started 15 years ago and provides an income to cover the costs of maintaining decorative planting on the islands.

Quite why the Council has decided to refer the issue to a planning committee – with all that entails in additional time and costs – is unclear.  It would have been easier and quicker to delegate the decision to officials (unless any objections were received).Sponsored Tadcaster Road roundabout

The locations being discussed on 8th September include:

The Council receives around £25,000 a year from the sponsorship which is managed by a third party.  Around 30 sites are available to rent.

Record number of new homes built in York last year

Student units account for 52% of 1121 total

Housing compl,etions 2006 to 2016

2015/16 saw the largest number of new homes provided in York since 2006.  1121 units were provided of which 908 were new build, 218 a “change of use” with one conversion. Six homes were demolished.

 579 dwellings for students were provide mainly on sites in Lawrence Street and Walmgate.

Figures released by the York Council suggest that a significant part of the surge in provision (over 100 units) resulted from a legal relaxation which makes it easier to convert offices into residential accommodation. The change, allowing for the office to residential conversions (together with certain retail, financial services and existing agricultural buildings) without the need to apply for full planning permission, has now become permanent.

 Significant numbers of new homes were provided at:

  • Derwenthorpe, Osbaldwick (Phases II, III & IV) provided a total of 100 completions,
  • Sessions Former Print Works (18)
  • the Former Civic Amenity Site Beckfield Lane (18),
  • Burnholme Social Club (22)
  • Fox and Hounds 39 Top Lane Copmanthorpe (28) and
  • the first homes at the Windy Ridge/Brecks Lane Huntington Site (24)

The figures will strengthen the case for including a significant allowance for homes provided on windfall sites in any Local Plan calculations. Of the completions last year, over 100 (20% of non-student developments) were built on small sites that could not be separately identified in a Local Plan.  Housing planning consents 2006 to 2016

Planning permission for 680 additional homes was granted during the year.  

Of these 166 were for off campus student accommodation. Many of the others were for office to residential consents, the largest (58) being on the Land Registry site on James Street

The average annual number of planning consents over the last decade is 785.

This is broadly in line with the assumptions being made in the latest version of the Local Plan.

Latest planning applications for the Westfield Ward

Below are the latest planning applications received by the York Council for the Westfield ward.

Full details can be found by clicking the words highlighted in blue

—–

1 Woodford Place York YO24 4QR

Variation of Condition 1 of permitted application 15/01187/FUL to alter plans to include alterations to the internal layout to create a bedroom within the roofspace, and include 1 no. rooflight to rear

Reference           16/01886/FUL

—–

66 Slessor Road York YO24 3JG

Two storey side and single storey side and rear extensions (amendment to previously approved scheme 13/02384/FUL)

Ref. No: 16/01939/FUL 

——

17 The Knoll York YO24 3EB

Single storey front, side and rear extensions

Ref. No: 16/01902/FUL 

—–

 Representations can be made in favour of, or in objection to, any application via the Planning on line web site.  http://planningaccess.york.gov.uk/online-applications/

The Council now no longer routinely consults neighbours by letter when an application is received

Latest planning application for the Westfield Ward

Below are the latest planning applications received by the York Council for the Westfield ward.

Full details can be found by clicking the words highlighted in blue

———–

36 Danesfort Ave planning app Aug 201636 Danesfort Avenue York YO24 3AW

Proposal              Erection of detached building forming 2 flats

Reference           16/01496/FUL

—————

 Representations can be made in favour of, or in objection to, any application via the Planning on line web site.  http://planningaccess.york.gov.uk/online-applications/

The Council now no longer routinely consults neighbours by letter when an application is received

Lowfields campaigners attending Local Plan meeting at Acomb Library tomorrow (Thursday)

Residents, dismayed by the York Council’s plan to build on the sports field at the old Lowfields school site, are planning to register their objections at a Local Plan meeting tomorrow (Thursday).

The meeting is described as a “drop in” and takes place at the Acomb Explore Library. The Library is open between 9:00am – 9.30pm

The Local Plan has been changed to allocate 13 acres of land at the site for the development of up to 137 homes.  Previous plans had restricted any development to the  built footprint of the former school itself (6.5 acres).

In a recent survey residents indicted that they wanted more of the public green space in the area conserved with the retention of a sports pitch and the provision of a nature reserve popular suggestions.

Some residents have already recorded their objections to the Councils plan to overdevelop the Lowfields site.

Go online: www.york.gov.uk/localplan to complete the survey and to find a full copy of the Local Plan Preferred Sites document

York Council views on Lowfields development. Click to view whole reprt

York Council views on Lowfields development. Click to view whole report

Latest planning applications for the Westfield Ward

Bid to change flat to office on Front Street

Below are the latest planning applications received by the York Council for the Westfield ward.

Full details can be found by clicking the words highlighted in blue

—–

169 Askham Lane York YO24 3JA

Fell Horse Chestnut tree protected by Tree Preservation Order No.60

Ref. No: 16/01820/TPO 

gateway——–

The Gateway Centre Front Street York YO24 3BZ

Change of use of first floor flat (use class C3) to office

Ref. No: 16/01742/FUL 

————

 Representations can be made in favour of, or in objection to, any application via the Planning on line web site.  http://planningaccess.york.gov.uk/online-applications/

The Council now no longer routinely consults neighbours by letter when an application is received

Community Stadium – where next?

Good news that the York Council, York City FC and the Knights Rugby Club seemed to have reached a more robust agreement for playing matches at Bootham Crescent.

The next fixture in the “super 8’s” contest has been confirmed for Sunday afternoon (2:00pm) at the ground.

Our comment in March

Our comment in March (click)

However, speculation is increasing over the fate of the Community Stadium project itself.

A revised planning application for the stadium was granted in March 2015. The proposal could have been “called in” by the Secretary of State or made subject to a Judicial Review.

Neither happened, so it was a surprise when changes to the layout of the stadium were placed before the Planning Committee on 8th June 2016.  Important backers had withdrawn from the project and the Council was struggling to pre-let some of the commercial floor-space.

The changes were controversial involving as they did an enlarged multiplex cinema.

A further 10-week period, during which a Judicial Review of the scheme can be requested, ends in a few days’ time.

No statement has been issued by the Council, but in June Reel cinemas – who feared that the new multiplex would damage their business – had threatened legal action.

Any Judicial Review could add 6 months to the delivery timetable for the stadium project.  This would effectively put back a completion date to mid-2019. Whether the sports clubs can survive until that time may be a matter of speculation.

We have recorded on many occasions, since funding for a new stadium was found in 2010, that the Council should have got on with the project then rather than progressively to try to add, high risk, commercial – and social – elements.

This has produced a complex scheme which it is easy for opponents to delay.

Meanwhile the administrative costs of the project are eating away at the funds available for the development itself – producing a potential crisis for taxpayers in the City, not to say a further period of uncertainty for sports fans.

Developer eyes land next to Chapelfields

Chapelfields developmentAccording to papers seen by Ward Councillors, a developer is  still hoping to build on land at the top of Grange Lane. The news came only days after the Council announced that all existing Green Belt land lying between the built up area and the A1237 northern bypass would continue to be protected.

The confirmation of the existing Green Belt boundaries was made possible after the LibDems identified sufficient “brownfield” (previously developed) land to meet housing needs for the foreseeable future.

In total around 12,000 additional homes will be provided over the next 20 years under the new Local Plan

It means that building works will be concentrated on sites like the rear of the railway station.

However developers can appeal against this decision and they may have the support of the Labour party which originally tabled proposals which would have seen the City increase in size by 25%.

Local Councillor Andrew Waller has criticised the Grange Lane plans.

Aug 2016 Find out more Local Plan“Development on this site would exacerbate traffic problems in the area which are already acute at school arrival and leaving times. 

The fields between Chapelfields and the ring road provide a soft boundary between the open countryside and  the City and include some informal recreational walks.

They shouldn’t be sacrificed so a private individual can make a quick profit”.

I hope that residents will write to the Council supporting the existing Green Belt boundaries”. 

Response forms are available on the Council’s website (www.york.gov.uk/localplan ) or are available from the Council’s West Offices reception or from Acomb library.

 

Latest planning applications for the Westfield Ward

Below are the latest planning applications received by the York Council for the Westfield ward.

Full details can be found by clicking the words highlighted in blue

—-

66 Slessor Road York YO24 3JG

Non material amendment to permitted application 13/02384/FUL to increase size of rear extension and add rooflights

Ref. No: 16/01696/NONMAT 

—–

4 Ridgeway York YO26 5BZ

Two storey front extension and single storey rear extension and replacement of existing garage with new single storey pitched roof building

Ref. No: 16/01684/FUL 

——-

Christines Nail And Beauty 21 Front Street York YO24 3BW

Installation of door to side extension and removal of door to rear extension

Ref. No: 16/01563/LBC 

——–

Our Ladys R C Primary School Windsor Garth York YO24 4QW

Variation of condition 2 of permitted application 14/01037/FULM to allow minor revisions to site layout (retrospective)

Ref. No: 16/01536/FULM 

—————

Representations can be made in favour of, or in objection to, any application via the Planning on line web site.  http://planningaccess.york.gov.uk/online-applications/

The Council now no longer routinely consults neighbours by letter when an application is received

Oakhaven on York Road to become homeless hostel

Oakhaven

Oakhaven

The York Council has finally an admitted that the former Oakhaven elderly persons’ home will be turned into homeless person’s accommodation.

No external alterations are proposed to the building and internal changes are minimal. Currently the property has 27 bedrooms. The proposal is to change it to 10 one bed flats and 5 two bed flats.

Oakhaven has been empty – apart from some police training use – since it was closed last year.

The Council had talked euphemistically about the buildings being used to “house local families”. It turns out that the flats will replace the Ordnance Lane facility which is being demolished. Those units cater for homeless families and some individuals.  Occasionally they have housed teenagers on remand.

There are already two buildings being used to house homeless people in this part of the City (Holgate Road and Howe Hill)

Inevitably there are problems with any transient use. Noise and chaotic lifestyles do not always sit well with quieter neighbourhoods  or – in the case of the Front Street area – a recovering shopping precinct.

Most homeless families, of course, simply want to be moved a permanent home as quickly as possible. That should be the Council’s main target.

The Council’s planning committee is being recommended to approve the use of the building as a homeless hostel  for up to 18 months.

The Council has said that in 2018 it will build an extra care elderly people’s facility on the site.

The same Council department recently reneged on its promise to redevelop only 50% of the Lowfields school site