More details are being made available of a contract for the supply of furniture and “white goods” (e.g. fridges) to Universal Credit claimants in York.
It is part of the York Financial Assistance scheme, which is designed to help the poorest members of our community cope with budgeting pressures.
The contract is expected to be worth over £250,000.
Once again the Executive member (Nigel Ayre) has agreed to consider this proposal at a public decision meeting which is being held on 16th December.
Although the decision to seek tenders for this service isn’t particularly controversial, and any expenditure will be within budget allocations, the move to publish background papers will be welcomed by many taxpayers.
Hopefully other Executive Councillors will adopt a similar approach to transparency in the future.
TheCommunity Furniture Store (CFS) is the current provider of household goods for the York Financial Assistance Scheme (YFAS). The scheme, which is funded by City of York Council, provides basic furnishing for people in need as a result of a urgent personal circumstances.
1622 complaints were made against the York Council in the 12 months to April 2019. The figures are revealed in a report published today. They represent an increase from the 1353 recorded in the previous year.
The vast majority of the complaints related to lack of
action with other relating to “inappropriate action” 45% of the complaints were
either fully or partially upheld. 397
cases reach a second complaint stage. 58% of these were at least partially upheld.
156 complaints were escalated to the final local stage with
6 at least partially upheld.
60 cases were sent on to the Ombudsman who upheld 11 of
them. A summary of the Ombudsman’s finding in each case is included at the end
of the report
In some case modest financial compensation has been paid.
The figures show an increase in complaints about social care.
236 “compliments” were also recorded about the Council and its staff
No doubt the York Council would be criticised if it failed to keep residents informed about what goes on in the City and how the Council spends taxpayers money. Whether spending £10,000 on putting a magazine through everyone’s letterbox represents a prudent use of resources may divide opinion.
The current edition of “Our City” is tidier and therefore more accessible than previous editions. But it fails an important test.
It isn’t objective.
Telling people that things are going well when patently many street level public services in the City are far from that, transforms an information source into a propaganda channel.
There are major problems with keeping the streets tidy and free of weeds. The refuse collection service is now chronically unreliable. Many roads and paths are potholed. Some are dangerously obstructed by trees and hedges. These issues don’t merit a mention in “Our City”.
The Council does praise the hugely expensive community stadium project without telling people precisely when the stadium will come into use. Apparently the IMAX cinema (a plus for the City) will open in December but there is no explanation for the delays that have dogged the future home of York City FC and the York Knights Rugby team.
But the main concern will be the failure to be frank about the risks involved in some of its projects.
The Council is acting as its own housing developer and hopes to build 600 homes in the City over the next few years. It has recruited a significant number of additional staff to do so. It could have used local companies to undertake the work but chose not to. It is a high risk venture but, at the end of the day, in York any new homes will be occupied one way or another.
The same can’t be said about the £20 million Guildhall redevelopment. There is little evidence to suggest that a “business club” is needed in the City and even less that the York Council would be the best organisation to manage one.
The “Our City” article disingenuously talks of the project generating £848,000 a year in rents. It fails to point out that would involve renting out all the available space and that, even then, the income would be barely sufficient to pay the interest payments on the money that the Council intends to borrow to fund the scheme!
Sadly similar mistakes have been made in the past. £12 million was spent on the Barbican concert hall. The Council chose to manage that facility itself despite a complete lack of experience in the field. It later turned out that the hall manager had failed to apply for an entertainments licence for the building and had operated it unlawfully for several months. The Barbican ran at a loss of £800,000 a year and eventually had to be sold on to the private sector.
Whether anyone will come forward to rescue the Guildhall project remains to be seen.
It is nearly 6 months since the Chief Executive of the City
of York Council went on sick leave. The problem arose shortly after the May
local elections and left the largely inexperienced new Council with inadequate senior
The result was that there was a lack of direction during the
summer period with the standard of several public services noticeably falling.
The Council drifted into several decisions, including a £20
million Guildhall redevelopment contract, without the rigorous reappraisal that
a new administration, acting with the advantage of experienced advisors, might
have chosen to approach differently.
The Council must now consider whether to continue with a temporary
Chief Executive – a senior officer “acting up” – or whether to move to something
Long service Chief officers in local government are entitled
to 6 months sick leave on full pay followed by 6 months on half pay. So potentially
if the Chief Executive continues to be absent there will be funding available in
the budget to cover any backfill.
Not an easy decision and the health of employees must always
be a paramount consideration.
But York taxpayers will now expect to see a roadmap published
which shows a way back to having a full management team in place in the City.
There are simply too many decisions coming along (including the completion of the Community Stadium, the Guildhall, York Central, York Bypass improvements etc.) to allow a continued policy drift.
City of York Council’s full council declared a climate emergency in March 2019, and agreed to set a target to become net carbon neutral by 2030.
A report is now being taken to the council’s Executive to provide an update on the next steps to progress the climate change action plan.
Following the climate emergency declaration, a new cross-party climate change policy and scrutiny committee was created to help develop the climate change action plan. Its first meeting will take place in September (and every other month after that).
The council is in the process of recruiting officers to two new posts to address sustainability and climate change to support on this work.
A report detailing the next steps will be taken to a public Executive meeting on Thursday 29 August.
York has a strong history of taking the lead on reducing carbon useage, including:
£2m programme of LED street lighting;
Solar PV installed on 541 council houses;
Air source heat pumps installed in 57 council houses;
A programme of cavity wall and loft insulation across the council’s housing stock;
Work with private tenants and homeowners to draw on funding from Government and regional programmes for improved energy efficiency and delivered through Better Homes Yorkshire;
Plans to use an innovative water-source heat pump for heating the redeveloped Guildhall complex;
Council support for the Treemendous initiative to plant 50,000 trees in York;
Investment in improvements to cycling infrastructure including the recent opening of the Scarborough Bridge cycle route and promotion of cycling – including achieving Cycling City status;
The i-Travel programme which includes active promotion of walking, cycling and sustainable travel options to groups and individuals.
Residents, businesses and community groups are being asked to comment on how City of York Council can help them achieve the best quality of life in the city.
Through the council plan consultation, City of York Council is wanting to hear from residents, businesses and community groups and ask them to comment on eight suggested outcomes for the council over the next four years. They are:
Good health and wellbeing
Well paid jobs and an inclusive economy
Getting around sustainably
A better start for children and young people
A greener and cleaner city
Creating homes and world-class infrastructure
Safe communities and culture for all
An open and effective council.
As well as comment on these themes and what they mean to them, residents, businesses and community groups will also be asked what they think the council could do to achieve the outcomes and what they could do in support.
Residents without online access will also have the chance to contribute their views at venues around the city or add their thoughts to pop-up boards in public spaces or other activities taking place across the city.
Councillor Keith Aspden, Leader of City of York Councilsaid: “Residents, businesses and community groups make York such a fantastic place to live and work. We want to hear from them what we can do to deliver against the suggested outcomes and how they may be able to support this journey to being a cleaner, healthier city with an inclusive economy.”
“Once complete, this plan will set our ambitious vision for the future of the city and set clear expectations on how we propose to deliver improvements for residents, against which we will monitor delivery and measure performance.
“We look forward to hearing suggestions from people about what our priorities should be.”
Councillor Andy D’Agorne, Deputy Leader of City of York Council said: “The council plan is important so we can clearly set out what we hope to achieve over the course of the next four years. These proposals acknowledge the need for us to address the climate emergency declared by full council and listen to residents’ ideas about what the council should do to address this. We would like to hear what actions individuals, businesses and organisations might take to support this work.
“As well as climate change, the proposed outcomes also consider a range of social, economic and environmental factors we are keen to prioritise and ensures the city supports a good quality of life for residents.
“We look forward to hearing from residents, businesses and local community groups. We think it is really important they have a chance to discuss and play a part in the work we will be doing over the next four years and want to hear their views and suggestions.”
Counter fraud work by the York Council saved taxpayers over
£300,000 in York during the last year.
The figure is revealed in a report
which will be considered by a Council committee next week.
The report reveals that it received 345 reports of possible fraudulent
42% of the cases related to fraud in social care. 22% in Council
tax/Rates, 18% related to housing fraud and 11 concerned benefit claims.
Officials also investigated the misuse of blue badges for parking.
Officials claim that 84% of investigations were successful with two people
prosecuted and a further 10 cautioned.
Three false applications for school placements were also
In 2018/19 the team identified over £201,000 of losses to
the council, for social care fraud. This was a 19% increase from the previous
financial year. Over £137,000 of savings were produced which represents a
substantial rise compared to 2017/18 (£38k).
Two people were prosecuted for fraudulently claiming monies,
from the York Financial Assistance Scheme, that they did not require.
It’s not just the political future of he York Council which is up in the air.
With the defeat of Keith Myers in the Acomb poll on Thursday, the City is desperately seeking a replacement to be the next Lord Mayor.
It is still the Conservatives turn to nominate. However, They
are down to only two remaining members. To become Lord Mayor a Councillor must
have at least 4 years service on the Authority. Many former post holders will feel
that many more years of experience are required if someone is to make a success
of the office.
.. and there is the first problem. Only Tory Paul Doughty
from Strensall qualifies. He may, or may not, want to take on the exacting full-time
role. If he does, then he will face the decision whether to nominate his partner
as his consort or find another volunteer.
The Sherriff of York – nominated by the Lord Mayor – also forms
part of the Civic Party. The holder does not have to be a Councillor. Given his
interests in conservation, this might be an ideal role for Keith Myers, if he
can get over his disappointment in not achieving the top job.
But suppose the Tories turn down the post. What happens then?
This has happened in the past. Groups unwilling, or unable,
to nominate lose their accumulated qualification points.
The Council uses a points system which allocates each group
on the Council a point for each Councillor that they have (at the end of May
each year). The group with the largest number of points nominates the Lord
Mayor for the following year. When a party nominates, they lose 47 points (equivalent
to total the number of Council seats) and must start to accumulate points again.
The system has worked well. In non election years the likely incumbent has had plenty of time to prepare for the office, while smaller groups do qualify to provide the city’s figurehead. The Green party nominated the Lord Mayor for the first time a couple of years ago.
So, if the Tories turn it down, what happens then?
The Group with the next highest points total would be asked
to nominate. That means someone will get only 3 weeks to prepare to take on the
role from 23rd May. Many dates will already be in the prospective
Lord Mayors diary .
The Labour group have the next highest points total. However
only one of their number – their current Leader Janet Looker, who is also a
previous Lord Mayor – has over 4 years experience. There are others who may
qualify under a rule change agreed last year which allows those who have served
for 4 years and who were re-elected on 2nd May to be nominated. However, that means an inexperienced
Councillor being thrust into a new role with minimal time to prepare.
The task might be less daunting if the nomination goes to a
former Lord Mayor.
All should become clear when the invitations to attend Lord Mayors Day are issued.
Good luck to whoever is passed the chains of office.