Who is best for Front Street and Acomb Village – Labour or LibDems?

The two strongest parties in the west of York have thrown down the policy gauntlet to each other – 9 months before the crucial Council election poll which is scheduled to take place next May.

A motion about Front Street will be debated at tomorrow (Thursdays) Council meeting.

Acomb branch office closed by Labour in 2012

Acomb branch office closed by Labour in 2012

Absentee Labour Councillor S Burton kicked off the contest by tabling a motion which calls for the Cabinet to “receive options to consider extending business rates relief for all empty properties on Front Street being brought back into use.”

Liberal Democrat Councillors responded by calling for a much more comprehensive “regeneration” strategy.

At tomorrows meeting Cllr Lynn Jeffries will ask Councillors to vote for an alternative approach:

“Council also notes that additional pressure was placed on the Front Street commercial area by the Cabinets decisions to close the Councils local Acomb Office in 2012, to dramatically reduce the funding that local ward committees had available to invest in the public realm at neighbourhood level and by the Councils decision to reduce public service standards such as the number of litter and salt bins available in the Acomb/Westfield area.

Council further notes that the present administration has allocated funding in excess of £5 million for projects to “reinvigorate” the City centre while spending only £7,764, of an allocated £30,000 budget, on improvements in the Acomb commercial area.

Council therefore calls on the Cabinet to take the following action:

  1. Consider options for extending business rates relief for long term empty properties in the Front Street area which are brought back into use, while giving full support and publicity to the availability of increased business rates relief for existing small shops and businesses (as championed by Vince Cable MP, Business Secretary).
  2. Agree to initiate a comprehensive regeneration package for the Front Street area including the development of a public/private investment plan aimed at transforming the safety, reputation and appearance of the whole area.
  3. Take immediate steps to uplift the streetscape including improvements to cleanliness, footpaths, back lanes and lighting while renewing/painting street furniture and providing better ice clearance standards in winter.
  4. To use its powers to encourage the diversification of the type of business and retail outlets available in the area while resisting a rise in the number of socially unproductive units such as betting shops, amusement arcades etc.
  5. Work with the Acomb Alive team, traders and local residents to ensure that a street market is established in the area as soon as possible

The Council records its appreciate for the work of residents and traders in the area which has resulted in an increase in the number of social and arts activities taking place in the Front Street area and further places on record its belief that the increase in the number of new businesses setting up in Acomb during the last year reflects its growing confidence in the future of the neighbourhood”.

Labour still have a small overall majority on the Council and so might expect to win the vote.

However the writing is on the wall for next year when a change in Council control will herald a fresh approach in west York.

 

4 thoughts on “Who is best for Front Street and Acomb Village – Labour or LibDems?

  1. […] went on to vote down proposals to introduce an ambitious regeneration programme for the Acomb Front Street […]

  2. […] The Council still continues to in a state of denial about public service standards in the Front Street area. […]

  3. […] As we have said before, there is a good case for improving on the government scheme which gives a Rates discount on re-occupied properties which have been empty for more than 12 months. […]

  4. […] As we have said before, there is a good case for improving on the government scheme which gives a Rates discount on re-occupied properties which have been empty for more than 12 months. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *