New accident numbers and speed checks wreck case for 20 mph speed limit in York

The Council has responded to a Freedom of Information request on accident levels – and recorded vehicle speeds – in the west of York.

This is the district in which it is proposed a wide area 20 mph speed limit will be imposed.

Residents have only got until 21st June to record a formal objection to the plan. This can be done by Emailing highway.regulation@york.gov.uk or 20mph@york.gov.uk

click to enlarge

click to enlarge

click to enlarge

click to enlarge

The main argument, used by some Labour Councillors to justify the £600,000 project, is that it will reduce the number of road traffic accidents (RTAs) in the area.

The new figures made available by the Council undermine this claim

The roads with the worst accident records in west York are Tadcaster Road, Boroughbridge Road and Holgate Road

In the last 5 years there have been 383 RTA’s in the area (broadly the Acomb, Westfield, Holgate and Dringhouses wards).

Of these the vast majority (339) have been “slight”. Slight means no or only minor injuries were sustained

There were no accidents at all on the majority of roads which the Council proposes to implement a 20 mph speed limit.

No – current – vehicle speed information is available either and they are excluded from the tables (left)

Of the accidents recorded, 335 (87%) occurred on roads where there are no plans to lower the speed limit.

This is not surprising as these are the main arterial routes which are heavily trafficked and where there are potential conflicts at road junctions. Of these accidents, 2 were fatal (both on Holgate Road) 33 serious (6 on Tadcaster Road) and 300 slight.

Only 13% of accidents occurred on roads where it is now proposed to reduce the speed limit. Of the 48 accidents there was one fatality (on Cranbrook Avenue), 8 serious accidents and 39 slight.

Significantly, 95 accidents occurred during this period on roads which already have a 20 mph speed limit (enforced by road humps.) Of these, 9 were classified as “serious”

Average vehicle speeds on roads which may get a 20 mph limit are already low.

The highest was 31 mph recorded on Tudor Road. This reflects the speed that 85% of drivers travel at, or below, when using the road.

More typically the range for the planned 20 mph streets was between 15 mph and 25 mph.

The lowest recorded speed was on Ganton Place (13 mph) although this is a speed typical of many short cul de sacs.

The top recorded speeds were on Tadcaster Road (79 mph), Wetherby Road E (71), Carr Lane (66) and Front Street (66). However the recording devices cover 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, so the figures would include any emergency vehicles responding to calls.

The inescapable conclusion therefore is that the Council is focusing its safety budget on roads where there is little or no accident risk.

Those roads where high speeds may be an issue may already be getting less attention.

Accidents can occur anywhere at any time. The fact that a large proportion of serious accidents are concentrated at particular locations has allowed the Council, in the past, to concentrate its limited resources on addressing the main causes of these accidents.

Often vehicle speeds will not be a major factor affecting accident rates in residential areas. Vehicles reversing into street furniture are an example of an accident where a speed limit has no influence. Similarly a cyclist colliding with a pedestrian is unlikely to be caused by an excessive speed.

The Council should abandon its wide area 20 mph speed limit project and focus resources on roads with high accident rates and/or where there is evidence of drivers systematically ignoring the existing speed limits.

NB. There are currently around 65 KSI accidents occurring in York each year. Of these, less than 20% occurred in west York. Most happen on trunk roads and in the City centre.

Government acts to end York Council secrecy

secrecy
The government has taken action which should ensure that residents have more access to Council meetings and background papers.

The York Council will have to allow the media to film its meetings and residents will be able to “tweet” progress reports on debates.

Both these activities have been discouraged by the York Council during the last couple of years.

The new code which can be accessed by clicking here specifically highlights the need for the local authority to avoid the possibility of any filming deterring “public speakers”.

One key change is that “decision takers” are now required to publish background papers in advance of a decision being made. At present when a cabinet member makes a decision on their own (or in consultation with an officer) the York Council publishes the background papers and the decision on the same day – effectively preventing residents from making representations n the issue.

The code says that withholding a document can be a criminal offence

It is a criminal offence if, without a reasonable excuse, a person who has in his or her custody a document10, which the national rules require to be made available to the public, refuses to supply the whole or part of the document or intentionally obstructs any other person/s from disclosing such a document.
If a person is found guilty of such a criminal offence, he/she can be fined up to £200.

This appears to address the recent case of a Local Plan background document (a report by ARUP into housing growth in the City) which was withheld by officials on the grounds that it was a “draft” report.

Now any background document which is considered by the Cabinet/Executive must be made available to the public.

This is a major test for the York Council.

Either it will honour the spirit of the code and require greater transparency in its decision making processes or it will seek to exploit any loopholes in the legislation that it can find.

Rubbish skips this weekend

Rubbish skips this weekend
Although the Council has cut back on the number of amenity skips it provides, several residents associations continue to run programmes aimed at making it easier for tenants to get rid of unwanted items.
The skips are only in place for a few minutes and residents must ensure that they put any rubbish into the skips and do not leave it on the path or highway.

Saturday 15.6.13
1 Fenwick St 08:30 09:30
2 Rogers Court 10:30 11:30
3 Vincent Way 12:30 13:30
4 Morrell Court 08:30 09:30
5 Corlett Court 10:30 11:30
(more…)

Terry’s development – “planning flexibility” explained

Terry's
A few weeks ago Council leaders were photographed with the new owners of the Terry’s development site (Henry Boot).

They promised “flexibility” on the planning conditions applied to the stalled development.

A meeting of the planning committee taking place next week will be given details of this “flexibility”.

The main change seems to be a reduction in requirements for affordable housing. This is down from 30% (82 units) included in the original permission to 20%.

The figure may vary further at each phase in the development.

Contributions towards other public services may also be changed as each phase progresses. These include a large £1.1 million contribution towards schools provision.

Unusually for York, no Great Crested Newts have been found on site!

NB. The report confirms that the York Green Belt contained in the Regional Spatial Strategy of 2008 is still in force. It is relevant to the Terry’s site as the car park on Bishopthorpe Road lies within it. However this is also likely to be highly relevant to the continuing debate about the proposed Local Plan.

Unemployed numbers down in York

The Office for National Statistics have released figures today stating that there are 2763 claimants in York, a decrease of 135 from last month and of 658 from May 2012.

The claimant count represents 2.1% of the working population and contrasts to the regional average which stands at 4.6%.

The figures are also much lower than the national average which stands at 3.7%.

The figures display a year on year improvement in the number of claimants in the city with the figures representing the lowest May claimant count since 2008.

Road closure threatens Water Lane traffic flow

A meeting on 20th June is to look again at a permanent road closure on Westminster Road.

Residents in the street have campaigned for over 6 years for through traffic to be banned from using it (and The Avenue) as a short cut to avoid the Water End traffic lights. Now a 79 signature petition is due for consideration.

“Rat run” traffic levels on Westminster Road have always been well below the numbers seen on similar routes and the street has road calming “sleeping policemen” to control vehicles speeds

Westminster Road may be closed to traffic

Westminster Road may be closed to traffic


Part of the problem has been traced to parents dropping off children at the school on The Avenue. Around 30% of vehicles are making this trip between 8:15am and 8:45am.

Recent traffic patterns have been disrupted and trends are difficult to track.

Initially improvements to the A19/A1237 roundabout at Rawcliffe provide some relief to the Water End junction and later 2 approach lanes to the traffic lights were restored. Road works on Boroughbridge Road (and more recently at the A59/A1237 junction) have continued and may be deterring drivers from using this sector of the City.

Council officials report that morning traffic levels on Westminster Road have fallen recently although an increase in the evening peak has been noted.

Closure of the route could increase traffic on the Water Lane junction by 10% but the major influence is likely to be the Councils plan to close Lendal bridge to private traffic from August.

There is no doubt that this would increase traffic in the Clifton Green area, with particular problems building between 4:00pm and 5:00pm.

The Council has so far refused to publish details of the forecast traffic levels on York’s river bridges pre and post the Lendal bridge closure.

Officials are recommending that no road closure on Westminster Road be agreed.

Bonding Warehouse media centre plan abandoned

Bonding Warehouse

Bonding Warehouse

Media reports suggest that the Bonding warehouse is no longer being considered as a possible “media and creative centre”.

Taxpayers will be relieved.

Many residents were aghast last year when the flood prone building was put on a shortlist for the project.

It had been sold by the Council at the height of the property boom 5 years ago but had failed to find a new use. Access during high water levels in the Ouse makes the building inaccessible in its present form.

In total around £3.6 million of taxpayers’ money was earmarked for the project. No convincing business plan has yet been published with earlier estimates suggesting that the private sector would contribute only around 20% of the investment costs.

In the autumn even Labour Councillors began to challenge the wisdom of the project.

It was revealed that taxpayers had already footed a £25,000 bill for the – now abandoned – Bonding Warehouse project.

It seems that the focus of attention for this project is now switching to the Guildhall which has been empty now for 3 months.

There is likely to be more widespread support for the use of the modern office next at the Guildhall as some sort of business centre. Whether the financial figures can be made to stack up remains to be seen.

If the Council is now beginning to jettison some of its more harebrained schemes then they could look again at their proposed £100,000 investment in an “Arts Barge”.

We remain sceptical about the need for any additional arts venue in the City, but it would be better to site any such facility on dry land. The Guildhall might just allow 2 birds to be killed with one stone …. But taxpayers will want to see more convincing evidence that the projects can be self funding.

NB. The owners of the Bonding Warehouse are understood to be pursuing its possible use as a restaurant, offices and flats.

Join in the #AskTheChief webchat

North Yorkshire Police’s new Chief Constable Dave Jones is hosting a webchat between 5pm and 6.30pm this coming Monday (17 June 2013).

Residents are invited to take part in the question and answer session, giving local people a direct opportunity to raise the crime and anti-social behaviour issues that matter most to communities across North Yorkshire and the City of York.

To join the webchat visit www.northyorkshire.police.uk/webchat. You can also set yourself an email reminder in advance so you don’t miss it!

(more…)