Not everything is well with the budget announced by Chancellor Osborne. But, as we all know, his options were limited by economic problems which spread back over 5 years and longer.
He should get some credit for trying to tackle major issues like the supply of new homes, addressing the costs of child care and controlling fuel prices
He helped the less well off by bringing forward the zero tax threshold for those earning £10,000 a year, while leaving the “millionaires” tax rate at a higher level than Labour were content to levy for most of their term of office.
So what do the Labour party apologists find to criticise?
One Julia Unwin, who heads the previously well respected Rowntree Foundation in the city, claimed “The Chancellor faced a test: he needed to boost household’s incomes and help cut the cost of essentials. Neither was forthcoming”.
Really?
See above!
The problem with writing your media sound bites before actually reading the proposals is that you can look ridiculous. Perhaps she was taking a prompt from her partner – one Patrick Kelly – who resides deep in the mire that is the Labour Party in York?
But full marks to the Council Leader for Tweeting like a new pontiff that it was wrong to reduce the price of beer while ignoring the poor.
As perfect a reverse summersault as you are likely to see in the political world.
Last year the same pontiff made a heartfelt plea for beleaguered local pubs saying that the high cost of beer was forcing them towards bankruptcy.
(Not to mention the beer and skittles strategy which has seen the Labour Council squander hundreds of thousands of pounds on fairy lights, bonfires, parties and foreign travel!!!).